www. O S N E W S .com
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials
.
How brands secretly buy their way into website stories
By Thom Holwerda on 2017-12-05 20:07:31

People involved with the payoffs are extremely reluctant to discuss them, but four contributing writers to prominent publications including Mashable, Inc, Business Insider, and Entrepreneur told me they have personally accepted payments in exchange for weaving promotional references to brands into their work on those sites. Two of the writers acknowledged they have taken part in the scheme for years, on behalf of many brands.

One of them, a contributor to Fast Company and other outlets who asked not to be identified by name, described how he had inserted references to a well-known startup that offers email marketing software into multiple online articles, in Fast Company and elsewhere, on behalf of a marketing agency he declined to name. To make the references seem natural, he said, he often links to case studies and how-to guides published by the startup on its own site. Other times, he’ll just praise a certain aspect of the company’s business to support a point in an otherwise unrelated story. (As of press time, Fast Company had not responded to a request for comment.)

This is hardly surprising to anyone who has spent a decent amount of time on the web. I can confirm, however, that I've never partaken in anything like this, and the occasional request of this nature goes straight into my spam folder.

 Email a friend - Printer friendly - Related stories
.
Post a new comment
Read Comments: 1-10 -- 11-13
.
Well, maaaaaybe
By Jesuspower on 2017-12-05 23:56:32
I'd consider it, but all I've ever gotten were idiot articles about sports promoting god knows what for 2 digits. :P
Permalink - Score: -1
.
Not particularly surprising
By StephenBeDoper on 2017-12-06 02:03:57
The whole advertorial/"native advertising" scheme has been going on for a while now. And while there's been a fair amount of coverage (E.g. Jim Sterling's "Casinos and SEO Juice" a few months back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3...), the cynic in me suspects those examples are only the tip of the iceberg. "Native advertising" seems to be similar to things like CGI, usability, in that it's only noticeable when it's done badly.

By way of personal anecdote, I used to get fairly regular inquiries from potential hosting customers in the US, who were specifically looking for hosting on servers physically located in Canada. For a while, I couldn't figure out why (it's almost always more expensive than US-based options, even without with the exchange rate)... until finally, I was contacted by someone who was shameless enough to admit that it solely because Canada doesn't have any equivalent to the US "endorsement disclosure" laws for bloggers.
Permalink - Score: 5
.
happened yesterday
By unclefester on 2017-12-06 02:51:12
Amazon Australia had a dismal launch yesterday. A couple of later there there was an avalanche of "news" extolling the virtues of Amazon and all the bargains there.
Permalink - Score: 4
.
Comment by Moonbuzz
By Moonbuzz on 2017-12-06 08:07:35
"[TechCrunch editor-at-large John Biggs] estimates that he receives two or three similar [bribe] offers each month, and he doesn’t take them seriously."

Which is as far as I got in reading this article. TechCrunch is in bed with so many companies and startups it doesn't need any off-the-street marketer to bribe their way into their articles.

"Organic press is far more effective"

Organic garbage, more like it. Next.
Permalink - Score: 3
.
Some examples
By avgalen on 2017-12-06 17:25:34
These kinds of articles raise my suspicion level the most:

* "What I use". It often sounds like these are the personal devices of the writer, but often they are "loaners/give-away/demo-mod els" supplied by the manufacturers. As long as there is a disclaimer at the top of the article and with every product as a reminder I am okay with this
* "Best in category". Often the devices came first and the category is created around them. Other models are, often intentionally, left out
* Product placement
* How to do "AI", where "AI" then becomes synonymous with 1 specific product or where it is linked to a conference to learn more
* Product X is horrible (written by somebody that works on a competing product)
* Company Y is horrible (written by somebody that works for a competing manufacturer)
* Or product X/Company Y is great (written by an employee or by a sponsored researcher)

In general it is good for a consumer to apply this 1 journalistic principle: What is the reason that the writer of this piece wrote the piece?
Permalink - Score: 3
.
On Network TV News
By Pro-Competition on 2017-12-06 20:28:36
I have no evidence to back this up, but I suspect that the same thing is happening on network TV news in the US (NBC, ABC, CBS).

I started getting suspicious when they would have a story about a drug study (needless to say, teased with exaggerated headline) with only marginally interesting results. It was jarring, especially considering the many important stories in the world that get no coverage at all.

It only makes sense if they are paid "infomercial" pieces. And the crass way the network executives admit to their greediness does nothing to argue otherwise. (The hand-wringing of books like "Who Killed CBS?" in the 1980s seems quaint now.)
Permalink - Score: 3
.
Who tried it with OSNews?
By zima on 2017-12-06 23:50:22
So Thom, are you willing to share with us which brands/companies tried to get into bed with you? :) (assuming the soliticors reveal that in their first emails...)
Permalink - Score: 2
.
RE: Who tried it with OSNews?
By Moonbuzz on 2017-12-07 07:45:42
Turn off your adblocker and you'll see. Its usually at the top of the page.
Permalink - Score: 1
.
RE: Who tried it with OSNews?
By Thom_Holwerda on 2017-12-07 12:58:39
It's usually start-ups and such that try to get you to write about them. They're usually unknown, and every once in a while, I'll read about them on some other site months after the fact.

I get these maybe a few times a month, but not all of them are literally in the form of "i gib u monies, u write about us". Often they're a bit sneakier, and I suspect that were I to engage them, they'd offer that later.
Permalink - Score: 2
.
Nothing new under the sun
By crimperman on 2017-12-07 16:13:08
This is not new and possibly not news either.

People who have an audience (bloggers, actors, sports stars) have long been used to promote products. How many times do we see a sports competitor "drinking" out of a Lucozade Sport bottle at the end of a competition which probably contains just water? The "What I use/drink/eat..." phenomenon (as someone else put it) has been going long before people blogged it.
Permalink - Score: 2

Read Comments 1-10 -- 11-13

Post a new comment
Username

Password

Title

Your comment

If you do not have an account, please use a desktop browser to create one.
LEAVE SPACES around URLs to autoparse. No more than 8,000 characters are allowed. The only HTML/UBB tags allowed are bold & italics.
Submission of a comment on OSNews implies that you have acknowledged and fully agreed with THESE TERMS.
.
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials
.
WAP site - RSS feed
© OSNews LLC 1997-2007. All Rights Reserved.
The readers' comments are owned and a responsibility of whoever posted them.
Prefer the desktop version of OSNews?