www. O S N E W S .com
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials
.
Some Windows 10 Pro licenses are mistakenly deactivated
By Thom Holwerda on 2018-11-08 15:57:23

Some Windows 10 users are having problems with their Pro licenses today, as users on the company's Community Forums and Reddit are reporting that their Windows 10 Pro systems are saying they are not activated, and telling users to install Windows 10 Home instead. Most of the reports appear to be coming from users who obtained the Windows 10 license thanks to the free upgrade path Microsoft offered back in 2015, suggesting that the issue is somehow related to it.

According to some of the reports, while the system says that users have a Windows 10 Home license, the Microsoft Store link in the settings page blocks them from attempting to buy a Pro license.

This happened to my workstation today, and it was a bit of a frightening moment - I earn my living using this machine, so seeing the big "Windows not activated" watermark certainly made me feel quite uncomfortable. Luckily, a reboot fixed it, but it does highlight just how problematic Microsoft's activation systems can be. I begrudgingly understand that Microsoft needs some way of determining the legitimacy of Windows installations and that it needs to deter piracy, but major bugs like this really shouldn't happen, ever.

Update: as it turns out, the reboot didn't fix my issue at all. After running for a little while, my machine again reverted to a deactivated state. This means a watermark on the desktop interfering with things like video games, and all personalization options - colours, backgrounds, etc. - are disabled. It also seems this issue is quite widespread.

Microsoft has not provided any official statement (!), and all we have to go on is an unofficial statement on its support forums that reads:

Microsoft has just released an Emerging issue announcement about current activation issue related to Pro edition recently. This happens in Japan, Korea, American and many other countries.I am very sorry to inform you that there is a temporary issue with Microsoft's activation server at the moment and some customers might experience this issue where Windows is displayed as not activated.

Our engineers are working tirelessly to resolve this issue and it is expected to be corrected within one to two business days.

This is clearly unacceptable. Users' machines currently have functionality disabled, and a big watermark is interfering with everything you do on your computer. Microsoft is basically saying "yeah just deal with that for a few days", which is entirely, utterly, and completely unacceptable.

Sadly, there's absolutely nothing users can do about this. As always, software is special and not held to the same standards as other products, so nothing will come of this - no fines, no government investigations, no lawsuits, nothing. If this happened to a car or even a goddamn toaster, recalls would be all over the news and heads would roll. Not with software, though - because software is special, and releasing garbage software under pressure from managers is entirely normal and acceptable, and repercussions and consequences are words entirely alien to consumer software companies.

Sadly, it is what it is.

Update II: the issue is now truly fixed. Affected users can go to Settings > ´╗┐Update & Security > Activation and click on the troubleshooter.

 Email a friend - Printer friendly - Related stories
.
Read Comments: 1-10 -- 11-20 -- 21-30 -- 31-40 -- 41-50 -- 51-53
.
Sooo ...
By WorknMan on 2018-11-08 17:09:30
Did it totally cripple your machine, or just start nagging you that you weren't 'legitimate'?
Permalink - Score: 6
.
They need to?
By fmaxwell on 2018-11-08 17:26:37
> I begrudgingly understand that Microsoft needs some way of determining the legitimacy of Windows installations and that it needs to deter piracy...

Why? None of my Macs, Linux, or BSD systems have background processes constantly sucking CPU cycles and taking up space in RAM for the purpose of preventing OS piracy.

Microsoft's outdated business model for Windows isn't sustainable in the long term. There are now too many competent alternatives from OS publishers that do not constantly try to extract more money from consumers for upgrades, updates, and new installations.

Note: If anyone wants to argue that the cost of macOS with free upgrades is built into the price of each Mac, then don't ever argue that Macs are an example of Apple's "overpriced hardware."
Permalink - Score: 6
.
RE: They need to?
By birdie on 2018-11-08 17:47:00
Not even that, with Windows you don't even own the OS - you lease it from Microsoft. No idea why people submit to this heresy.
Permalink - Score: 5
.
RE[2]: They need to?
By Kochise on 2018-11-08 18:52:27
Because a large load of professional program and other are on Windows, not on BeOS, ReactOS, Linux, MacOS, whatever, and Windows emulation on these platform is not always perfect.

Plus Windows, even though it have its downsides, is yet pretty good in the long run (99%) it isn't fair to finger point to the 1% failures when the other operating systems have too their quirks.

To sum it up, Windows is far far far good enough for 99% of users.
Permalink - Score: 3
.
RE: They need to?
By zima on 2018-11-08 19:37:09
> There are now too many competent alternatives from OS publishers that do not constantly try to extract more money from consumers for upgrades, updates
Free upgrade to Win10 still works... https://www.zdnet.com/article/her...
Permalink - Score: 4
.
RE[2]: They need to?
By Bill Shooter of Bul on 2018-11-08 20:01:22
You never own the software you use, you have a licence to it. That's always the case, unless you actually wrote it, or purchased all rights from the original authors.

Even with the GPL, GNU Public LICENSE.
Permalink - Score: 5
.
Oooh, so that was it...
By eprubio on 2018-11-08 20:06:03
Today I saw the watermark on my laptop and I just wondered WTF happened... Thanks for the heads-up!
That laptop already has dual boot, maybe I'll just go full Linux...
Permalink - Score: 1
.
Mmmmh..
By dionicio on 2018-11-08 20:46:20
First Generations of UEFI had BIOS workarounds. And Licences installed through those workarounds.

Maybe not accident. Maybe MS actually not knowing all bottoms (of stack).

Edited 2018-11-08 20:51 UTC
Permalink - Score: 1
.
RE[3]: They need to?
By ssokolow on 2018-11-08 21:06:26
> Even with the GPL, GNU Public LICENSE.

"General Public License", actually.

"GNU GPL" isn't a redundant acronym.
Permalink - Score: 3
.
Comment by Dr.Cyber
By Dr.Cyber on 2018-11-08 21:07:17
> This is clearly unacceptable.It is not. People will accept this as shown by the fact that they keep coming back for more.

> Sadly, there's absolutely nothing users can do about this.Aside from upgrading to a better OS.

> software is special and not held to the same standards as other products, so nothing will come of thisMany people do hold software to the same standards as other products but they do not use Windows.

Edited 2018-11-08 21:07 UTC
Permalink - Score: 3

Read Comments 1-10 -- 11-20 -- 21-30 -- 31-40 -- 41-50 -- 51-53

No new comments are allowed for stories older than 10 days.
This story is now archived.

.
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials
.
WAP site - RSS feed
© OSNews LLC 1997-2007. All Rights Reserved.
The readers' comments are owned and a responsibility of whoever posted them.
Prefer the desktop version of OSNews?