www. O S N E W S .com
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials

Is Ubuntu a poor standard bearer for Linux?
By Howard Fosdick on 2012-03-30 20:33:04
Two years ago, Linux guru Caitlyn Martin argued that "Ubuntu is a Poor Standard Bearer for Linux" due to reliability issues. She said that "Other distributions have problematic releases but other major distributions do not have significant problems in nearly every release. Ubuntu does." In her follow-up piece "How Canonical Can Do Ubuntu Right: It Isn't a Technical Problem," she explained how "...the problem I am describing is probably rooted in policy or business decisions that have been made..." and she offered specific ideas on how Canoncial could address the situation. Are these criticisms valid today? Does Ubuntu offer good reliability? Does it deserve its mindshare as the representative of PC Linux?

75  Comments - Printer friendly - Related stories
Recent related stories
- Ubuntu 17.04 Zesty Zapus released - 2017-04-17
- Ubuntu to switch back to GNOME, drop Unity - 2017-04-05
- Canonical releases Ubuntu 16.10 - 2016-10-13
- Review of the Ubuntu-powered Meizu Pro 5 - 2016-08-02
- Canonical unveils 6th LTS release of Ubuntu with 16.04 - 2016-04-21
- More related articles
 

Tell a friend
Your full name:
Your email address:
Your friend's email:
Anti-spam measure:
5+2=

News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials


WAP site - RSS feed
© OSNews LLC 1997-2007. All Rights Reserved.
The readers' comments are owned and a responsibility of whoever posted them.
Prefer the desktop version of OSNews?