www. O S N E W S .com
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials

Half an operating system: the triumph and tragedy of OS/2
By Thom Holwerda, submitted by toralux on 2013-11-25 17:32:38

It was now 1984, and IBM had a different problem: DOS was pretty much still a quick and dirty hack. The only real new thing that had been added to it was directory support so that files could be organized a bit better on the IBM PC/AT’s new hard disk. And thanks to the deal that IBM signed in 1980, the cloners could get the exact same copy of DOS and run exactly the same software. IBM needed to design a brand new operating system to differentiate the company from the clones. Committees were formed and meetings were held, and the new operating system was graced with a name: OS/2.

Fantastic article at Ars Technica about the rise and demise of IBM's OS/2. OS/2 is one of those big 'what-ifs' of the technology world, along the lines of 'what if Apple had purchased Be instead of NEXT' or 'what if Nokia had opted for Android' (sorry). Our technology world could've been a lot different had OS/2 won over Windows 3.x/95.

I reviewed OS/2 as it exists today (eComStation) six years ago.

30  Comments - Printer friendly - Related stories
Recent related stories
- ArcaOS 5.0 released - 2017-05-16
- OS/2 2.0, summer '91 edition - 2017-04-09
- Blue Lion, the next OS/2, moves into beta testing - 2017-02-06
- "Can someone explain the origin of the OS/2 table's name?" - 2016-07-21
- OS/2 resurrected: Blue Lion becomes ArcaOS - 2016-05-31
- More related articles
 

Tell a friend
Your full name:
Your email address:
Your friend's email:
Anti-spam measure:
5+2=

News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials


WAP site - RSS feed
© OSNews LLC 1997-2007. All Rights Reserved.
The readers' comments are owned and a responsibility of whoever posted them.
Prefer the desktop version of OSNews?