|Linux Mint "generally very bad when it comes to security"|
|By Thom Holwerda on 2016-02-22 11:04:46|
Over the weekend, news broke that Linux Mint's servers were compromised, and ISO images were replaced by compromised versions with a backdoor. Everything was made public, and int responded in the only way they could: disclosure, site taken down.
Sadly, it turns out that Linux Mint has somewhat of a bad name when it comes to security.
To conclude, I do not think that the Mint developers deliver professional work. Their distribution is more a crude hack of existing Debian-based distributions. They make fundamental mistakes and put their users at risk, both in the sense of data security as well as licensing issues.
I would therefore highly discourage anyone using Linux Mint until Mint developers have changed their fundamental philosophy and resolved these issues.
Let's hope this issue raises a number of red flags for the Mint team so they can start to take steps to better the situation.
- A broad overview of how modern Linux systems boot - 2018-06-18
- C gfx library for the Linux framebuffer with parallelism support - 2018-06-18
- The real power of Linux executables - 2018-05-31
- There's real reasons for Linux to replace ifconfig, netstat, et al. - 2018-05-25
- More related articles