www. O S N E W S .com
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials

Intel Core i9-7900X review
By Thom Holwerda on 2017-07-04 21:06:57

Intel's latest 10-core, high-end desktop (HEDT) chip - the Core i9-7900X - costs £900/$1000. That's £500/$500 less than its predecessor, the i7-6950X. In previous years, such cost-cutting would have been regarded as generous. You might, at a stretch, even call it good value. But that was at a time when Intel's monopoly on the CPU market was as its strongest, before a resurgent AMD lay waste to the idea that a chip with more than four cores be reserved for those with the fattest wallets.

[...]

AMD's Ryzen is far from perfect. But when you can buy eight cores that serve even the heaviest of multitaskers and content creators for well under half the price of an Intel HEDT chip, i9 and X299 are a hard sell (except, perhaps, to fussy gamers that demand a no-compromises system).

The question is: Are you willing to pay a premium for the best performing silicon on the market? Or is Ryzen, gaming foibles and all, good enough?

I've said this countless times, but I want to keep bringing this one home: this is what competition does. It lowers prices, improves performance, and makes Intel looks like a stumbling fool. And what better day to celebrate the benefits of competition than today?

Cheers, America. Party safe!

14  Comments - Printer friendly - Related stories
Recent related stories
- iPhone 8 is world's fastest phone (it's not even close) - 2017-09-24
- Google Now vs. Siri vs. Cortana - 2014-10-09
- The state of cheating in Android benchmarks - 2013-10-03
- Real world comparison: GC vs. manual memory management - 2012-09-06
- Web Browser Grand Prix VI: Chrome 13, Firefox 6, Mac OS X Lion - 2011-08-29
- More related articles
 

Tell a friend
Your full name:
Your email address:
Your friend's email:
Anti-spam measure:
5+2=

News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials


WAP site - RSS feed
© OSNews LLC 1997-2007. All Rights Reserved.
The readers' comments are owned and a responsibility of whoever posted them.
Prefer the desktop version of OSNews?