www. O S N E W S .com
News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials

Apple and Qualcomm's billion-dollar war over an $18 part
By Thom Holwerda on 2017-10-04 10:56:18

Within a matter of weeks, Qualcomm, which had been valued at more than $100 billion in December 2016, had lost a quarter of its market capitalization, an outcome that Qualcomm executives say was Apple's intent all along. "Apple's game plan is to squeeze people until they finally say, 'OK, the pressure's too hard. I'll just take a deal,'" said Derek Aberle, then Qualcomm's president and the company's chief negotiator, in an interview in July. Apple, on the other hand, presents the dispute as a matter of fairness. "It's not that we can't pay," Sewell says. "It's that we shouldn't have to pay."

The case, which could go to trial in a San Diego federal court as early as next year, could have a profound impact on the mobile phone business. A Qualcomm win would hamper Appleā€™s efforts to cut costs and preserve margins that have allowed it to capture most of the profits generated by smartphone makers worldwide. If Apple wins and succeeds in ending the Qualcomm tax, that could marginalize one of the most powerful American technology companies and upend the balance of power in the semiconductor industry.

I have zero sympathy for either of these two companies. I literally cannot find a single fournication to give.

17  Comments - Printer friendly - Related stories
Recent related stories
- Samsung CEO to resign citing 'unprecedented crisis' - 2017-10-13
- EU finds Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon - 2017-10-04
- The dystopia we signed up for - 2017-09-14
- Data of 143 million Americans stolen from Equifax - 2017-09-07
- EC hits Google with record 2.42 billion EUR fine - 2017-06-27
- More related articles
 

Tell a friend
Your full name:
Your email address:
Your friend's email:
Anti-spam measure:
5+2=

News Features Interviews
BlogContact Editorials


WAP site - RSS feed
© OSNews LLC 1997-2007. All Rights Reserved.
The readers' comments are owned and a responsibility of whoever posted them.
Prefer the desktop version of OSNews?